To protect bees and songbirds, California’s pesticide regulator is proposing new laws that would severely restrict the use of commonly used insecticides.
Aphids and other plant-damaging pests are targeted using neonicotinoids, a family of pesticides. The proposed restrictions would be some of the most comprehensive in the country. Bees, birds, and other animals are harmed by the very toxic insecticides.
Proprietary neonicotinoid drugs imidacloprid, thiamethoxam, clothianidin, and dinotefuran would be restricted under new restrictions proposed by the California Department of Pesticide Regulation to preserve bees that pollinate crops.
When and how much of a certain chemical can be used depends on the type of crop, the specific chemical, and the presence of honeybees or other pollinators. Pesticide regulators in California are still considering the public response, and there is no particular timetable for finalizing the proposal.
However, according to the state pesticide department, neonicotinoids are the most popular pesticides in the world – even though they aren’t popular in California.
Pesticide maker Bayer CropScience’s research that “showed possible hazardous effects of imidacloprid to pollinators” prompted California’s neonicotinoid reevaluation, which had been in the works for more than a decade. A 2014 law set a series of deadlines for re-evaluating their dangers and adopting “any management measures necessary to maintain pollinator health.”
In addition, a bill currently before the Legislature would prohibit the use of neonicotinoids in non-agricultural environments, such as homes, yards, and parks, beginning in 2024. A wide range of consumer goods, such as advanced All-in-One Rose and Flower Care Concentrate, which contains imidacloprid, has been approved for use in California.
While several jurisdictions have already outlawed outdoor use in gardens and residential areas, New Jersey and Maine are the latest to follow suit. Golf courses and other commercial landscapes are included under New Jersey’s ban.
Concern for bees led the European Union to restrict some neonicotinoids from being used outside at all. Agricultural use is already restricted in several areas, primarily by limiting access to pesticides to people who have received specialized training. Neonicotinoids are likewise prohibited in blooming crops in Rhode Island.
- Why California Forbids State-Funded Travel To Nearly Half of The States
- California is Losing Residents: Can the Trend Last?
A proposal by the California Department of Food and Agriculture to limit agricultural use of neonicotinoid chemicals might “seriously impact” when and how these products can be used in the nation’s No. 1 agricultural state.
Director of Pesticide Regulation acting chief deputy Karen Morrison said, “This is crucial.”. In the ecosystem as a whole, pollinators play a crucial role, as do crops and the ability to create food in the state.
Neonicotinoids are used on crops statewide
Agricultural chemicals are employed across the state, but the Central Valley and the Central Coast see the most action.
Neonicotinoids that are sprayed on plants and soil in California will be reduced by 45 percent, according to state authorities. Neonicotinoids would not be prohibited for usage on seeds, which is a common application for the chemicals.
Restrictions in California could limit growers’ ability to safeguard crops and harm pollinators in the long run, growers fear.
As a trade association of citrus growers, California Citrus Mutual, Casey Creamer, president, and CEO, says limiting the use of neonicotinoids could force the citrus industry to use other pesticides “not necessarily what the state of California wants” and could require “multiple sprays, something that may pose more risk to bees.”
Almonds, cherries, citrus, cotton, grapes, strawberries, tomatoes, and walnuts are among the primary crops projected to be adversely affected by the restrictions. Neonicotinoids have been used on nearly two-thirds of the state’s agricultural acreage since 2017 to protect these crops from pests. Five counties in California have the highest concentration of neonicotinoids: Fresno; Kern; Tulare; Monterey; and San Joaquin.
According to an analysis by the California Department of Agriculture and Food, some replacement chemicals may be more hazardous to bugs’ natural adversaries, resulting in worse infestations.
As an example, the pyrethroid alternative is “extremely poisonous to bees in that they attack the bee and kill it,” as well. According to a study by Robert Van Steenwyk, an emeritus cooperative extension specialist from the University of California, Berkeley, “If they are in the spray, they all die,” he stated. In other words, “it isn’t the best option.”
The Asian citrus psyllid, which spreads citrus greening disease, is an example of an invasive pest for which neonicotinoids are allowed under the rule.
Despite this, the California agriculture department’s specialists are predicting a rise in prices due to the price of replacement pesticides.
According to the California Department of Agriculture, the eight most affected crops generated over $19 billion in income in 2019. Farmers would have paid between $13.3 million and $12.1 million more in 2017 and 2019 if restrictions had been enforced.
Bayer CropScience’s representatives wrote to the pesticide regulator to express their displeasure with the idea, saying that it “is not supported by science.” Pesticide application rates “are not efficacious and consequently will not provide control of target pests” on some crops, according to the business, which also opposes the plan.
Birds, bees, and aquatic life
A new family of insecticides, neonicotinoids, was introduced in the 1990s and claimed to be less toxic to mammals and other animals.
Neonicotinoids, which mimic nicotine’s toxicity, are applied to crops, sprayed on plants, and drenched in fields. Insect neural systems are attacked by substances found in the plant, pollen, and nectar.
A growing number of studies have found that pesticides are endangering birds, bees, and aquatic life. Human health hazards are still being studied.
A study financed by pesticide producers found huge population declines in wild bees feeding near crops cultivated from neonicotinoid-treated seeds.
Aside from honey production, honey bees are raised and managed for their ability to pollinate crops. Insecticides kill worker bees, weaken the hive’s immune system, and leave colonies without queens, according to studies.
Insecticides also kill zooplankton, which is a food source for fish. Birds slow their journey by ceasing to feed. According to a study of three of the substances, the US Environmental Protection Agency concluded that between 67% and 79% of federally endangered or threatened species and 56% to 83% of their key habitats are at risk.
The chemicals don’t stay put, which is part of the problem. In 2020, entomology professors Steve Frank of North Carolina State University and John Tooker at Pennsylvania State University reported in the journal PNAS that they “can migrate from treated plants to pollinators and from plants to pests to natural adversaries.” Neocotoxins may pose a greater threat to biodiversity and food webs than previously thought, according to our research.
Groundwater and surface water samples from streams, rivers, and runoff in Southern California and agricultural portions of the Central Coast and Southern California show the presence of the pollutants.
At the University of California, Riverside, Jacob Cecala discovered that neonicotinoids are significantly more hazardous to honeybees than he expected.
Following the label’s directions to the letter, Cecala noticed that all of his bees had died within a month after treating native California plants with the neonicotinoid imidacloprid.
A kind of bee employed for pollination of alfalfa crops was the focus of his research. “Oh my god, I didn’t know what to do.” ‘How am I going to finish my dissertation?'” Cecala exclaimed in concern.
Although more bees survived, the survivors ceased foraging for food and their reproduction declined substantially after a further year, even after lowering the dose of pesticide by two-thirds.
According to Cecala, “Bees are insects — they’re just as sensitive to these compounds as an aphid or some other insect pest would be,” he added. “That’s the crux of the matter.”